Fourth Density Relationships – Part 2

Lyssa Royal channeling Sasha

…Continued from Fourth Density Relationships – Part 1


All right, this is Sasha. Greeting to all of you.

Greetings, Sasha.

It’s a pleasure to be here with you and especially talking about one of our favorite topics. We’re going to lighten it a little bit in the second half, and we’re just going to throw out to you that some of you have expressed some interest in the past about knowing personally about some of my relationships. That information is certainly available tonight if you would like to ask, just as a model so that you can be presented with a different way of having relationships. Our way is not any better or any worse than yours. It’s simply different; it’s an expression of who we are. Germane gave you quite a lot of information and this information that he’s given you are the tools you will now have and carry into the future relationships that you have in this life. It doesn’t have to be through pain that these changes are brought about; it really does not. Now, of course, if your belief system says that you must grow with pain, then it’s more than likely you will manifest it, but you don’t have to manifest pain. And you will begin to see, as you apply some of the tools that were given to you this evening, some of the understandings, you will begin to see changes in yourself and in your relationships. We cannot stress to you how much we mean what we said about that. You will see changes if you start to recognize when you are operating from third-density principles and attempting to bring them into a fourth-density relationship. When you start recognizing that and you start changing yourself, you are going to see tremendous, powerful changes within your life. Do not be surprised, and those changes will bring ecstasy and joy. They do not have to bring pain. Now, we’d like to take this opportunity to just be available to you for questions. So we’re going to let you orchestrate this part of the evening. What would you like to talk about? As you look into our future on Earth, what probabilities do you see? From the probability that we view, the way we see the changes in relationships happening is that the next 20 years is the crucial point. And within the next 20 years we perceive first more stress in relationships that are fighting change, overall, not necessarily in every single relationship. The actual overall societal change of relationships may externally seem to be a change brought about by necessity, necessity meaning single parents, perhaps with the shortage of a certain sex in a certain age group. However, what will bring about changes in your relationships will not be these external things but will be the internal momentum of your change of energy. The external things will just be symptoms of the change. Do you follow? So the next 20 years are the most crucial in our estimation. After that, you will begin adapting with less resistance overall, but of course within the next 20 years there need to be pioneers and groundbreakers, and many of you will choose to be such pioneers, and that is up to you and your personal choices and your agreements. But you are going to see changes in this lifetime, absolutely 100% guaranteed. Now, we would like to talk about the idea that is threatening to many of you, but as you know is a very solid foundation of Pleiadian thought. And that idea is the ability to love more than one person simultaneously. Third density is the density of polarity; literally that means two ideas are present, like two ping-pong paddles with a ball in between, back and forth, back and forth, back and forth. That dynamic cannot be broken in the density of separation and duality. As you move into fourth-density type relationships, you’re going to find that this rigidity is not necessarily going to work for you. It can, but it might not necessarily work for you. And so the introduction then of a third or a fourth or a fifth person is going to change the dynamic totally. And that is something that we would like to address, because there are many fears in many of you about the idea of loving more than one person simultaneously, and these fears are based in third-density premises so they cannot be applicable in a fourth-density reality. One of these premises is that if your mate loves another person, it takes away the love they can have for you. That is a third-density idea, because using the paddle idea, you have a finite amount of energy that you’re batting back and forth with the ping-pong ball. You are batting this ping-pong back and forth, back and forth, back and forth. There is a finite amount of energy expended between these two because there’s no expansion. Now, if you in third-density, insert a third variable, you are going to affect the energy between the two paddles, most definitely. The dynamics will have to change. In a fourth-density structure (which has been outlined by Germane), the ideas of unconditional love and trust, living in the moment, honesty, etc., are present. These 4D ideas do not support the idea that a third, fourth, fifth or millionth person entering your relationship can take away from the love that a mate can feel toward you. It cannot happen. Absolutely cannot happen. Period. Now, those of you who have spoken to us at length are aware that presently I have a single mate. I was also in a mated group, and in this mated group, the intensity of the love between the individuals was as strong, as intense, as equal to the love that is now felt between myself and my one mate. If another mate comes into my relationship now with my mate, it will not be a break in the flow of the energy. It will simply be an adding of another facet through which the energy can travel. And that is the difference between third- and fourth-density relationships when you’re talking about the ability to love more than one person. The basic structure of third-density is set up to support the idea of duality. The basic structure of fourth density is set up to experience multiplicity. So therefore, the amount of love is never less in a fourth-density relationship. Do you all follow?

Thoughts,comments or ideas or questions on this?

In third density it is so hard for me to see past the element of time. When you’re used to having a mate and therefore spending a certain amount of time with that mate, and then you bring in another mate, there’s a certain amount of time spent with her that in my mind I perceive isn’t spent with me. I get caught in the time factor.

Well, if spending time with your mate is equal to the idea of you not spending time with your mate, there will be no problem here. There is an inherent inequality within the emotions that is saying, “This is better than this, so if I don’t have this, I am deprived.” Do you follow? Now, again, we’re not saying, as Germane was not saying, that you must at all cost heal this, you must just go for it. Make your choices. As you start choosing how you want to live, these things are going to begin coming up. But recognize where the time element comes into it. It is not time. It is your identification with something that is equal or unequal in your reality. When you love yourself unconditionally, then the time spent with your mate will be equal to the time spent alone.

So when I spend time with my mate, I’m not alone. When I’m not with my mate I’m alone, so because of the aloneness, I don’t feel the one is equal to the other.

Exactly. And again in fourth density, as Germane was saying, the recognition is there that you are the generator of your happiness. You are it. And so when that recognition is there, that is when it is equal to be with the mate or to be with yourself because you love yourself as much as you love the mate. Both companies are appreciated. Both are equal. And when you see your mate, it’s exciting in the moment; when your mate is not there, you are excited in the moment with yourself.

Sasha, when you lived with a group, did you all live in one dwelling? I know now you two have separate dwellings.

We did live in one dwelling that is very similar to the one I live in now only on a larger scale. Did you want more on that?

Well, no, I was just curious about that because. Did you each have your own rooms in that dwelling?


So that you could be by yourself as much as you could be with someone else.

Yes. There were basically three different phases of environments. One were rooms of privacy, if you will, that only we entered. Then there is a secondary room where you enter with a specific group, invited guests you may call it. And then the third environment is the entire community environment, which is open to all. Question. Or comment.

We have a lot of barriers in our society toward this information, some of which are religion and societal conditioning. Can you help us learn how to share this information with the public and teach a new form of relationships?

Just like you cannot be responsible for hurting another, you cannot be responsible for enlightening another. Do what you can. But don’t start any more crusades! Each way is really different for each civilization, because the way that you will heal this is parallel to your identity as a species. So for instance, the Pleiadian viewpoint on the relationship issue came about because of our past and who we were in the past and through this evolution we came to this point. The same thing with the Essassani, and the same thing with the Orions. Now you on your planet, through who you have been as a species, will develop your own personal way to make this transformation. We do not perceive, at least right now, that there is a method by which to communicate with Earth humans that is any more thorough than what we have begun doing with you. The shift is going to happen. It is going to happen quicker as people consciously make choices to pursue these things. It will take longer if they resist it, but the transformation to fourth density is going to happen. The critical mass is going to happen. It’s just a question of when. And that is up to all of you and whether you choose to take the bull by the horns or whether you choose to run from the bull. Either way, it is still going to happen.

Sasha, one of the other trouble areas in relationships is that a lot of third-density relationships have been based on really feeling like you own or you possess the other person. I assume in fourth density that is completely absent.

That feeling of ownership or possession is the idea that Germane was talking about, having to deal with the need to control. So it’s that issue. Just with a different twist, or not even that different.

Sasha, you seem to be willing to talk about your own history tonight.

We knew you would be the one to bring it up.

Of course! Did you go right into this group from puberty?

Again, the line of puberty is not as defined as it is in your culture. After puberty I did a lot of studying and traveling and had relationships that you might call “flings.” But when I came back to my planet and built a homebase there, that’s when I was in the group.

So you were with the group 10-12 years or so?

Equivalent, yes, very rough, but it comprised the greater portion of my relationship experience.

And we’ve discussed before that there were seven members of this group, one non-Pleiadian and six Pleiadians. Is there anything further that would be helpful in terms of how and why you left the group? I assume the group itself also disintegrated.

Yes, it was simply a recognition that the excitement of the individuals involved in the group had changed. Several of the individuals wanted to go off the planet and explore, and some chose to go into a more quiet time. So when the excitement to change the relationship was recognized, there was no resistance, there was no fighting, there were no tears or anger. It was a recognition that the next step was to move in this direction. And because we had not anchored the past or the future into this relationship, it was a natural movement from one state to another.

One last question along these lines. We know that the Orion relationships are changing, that since the Dawn they will be reevaluating, rethinking their entire concept of relationships not based on conflict. We are going through relationship transformation. I would assume synchronistically that your civilization would also going through relationship transformation. If that’s true, what is the nature of that transformation that you’re experiencing as a culture?

We’re not so much experiencing a change in relationships as you are in the same way. It’s a little bit different. The change that we are experiencing has more to do with our change in our relationship with other species in that to some degree, not out of a sense of prejudice, let us say, but we have often preferred relationships with Pleiadian entities. We are opening up possibilities of relationships with all different types of species, and therefore for instance, to give you a very dramatic example, let’s say there’s a species who is so nonhuman that the sexual expression becomes impossible. We are learning the expression of that sexuality and that love in other ways. You follow?

Yes, and the time that you invited Bashar [an Essassani] and Harone [a Zeta] to your dome…What happened?!

Harone was baffled to say the least. You know those Zetas.

But that’s the kind of thing you’re discussing. That was kind of a landmark…

We never said that inviting them to the dome was a sexual experience, but that represents our reaching out to other species more than we ever have. Now, regarding the group that I was involved in for that amount of time we’ve said six Pleiadians and one non-Pleiadian, the non-Pleiadian was Essassani. That was not so much of a challenge, but he taught us a thing or two.

In third density, we have a situation where when children have been adopted out for example, it seems like it becomes very important to many of them to find out who their genetic parents are. A lot of this searching goes on. Maybe, in your situation you have enough control over your sexual activity that you know when you are being fertilized and when you aren’t. But in the transition that we’re going through we have not developed to the point where we’re always aware of that. Does the child always knows who their mother and father are? Does it become important for the child to know?

No. The idea of some individuals feeling the desire to know their true parentage is a reflection of the society’s or your mass consciousness’s need to gain your identity through your past. And if you were to live in the moment, that becomes irrelevant, because literally the past does not hold your answers; the present holds your answers. So because the children in our society are literally the children of all which is something we do share with the Essassani, no child feels unwanted. No child feels the need to find their identity through their past. They are very secure in their identity in the present. Again, a different developmental structure.

If sexuality is allowed to have its natural place which is everywhere in everything you do, it can’t be used against you, can it?

Exactly. Again, sexuality is not sex. We’re not talking about the sex act. We’re talking about the natural flow of energy in creation that is sexual/sensual in its nature. It is of a creative vibration. Now, many people have made the comment that they feel the sensual energy from the Pleiadian entities, and that is simply that we allow that energy to flow; there is no sexuality/nonsexuality. There is simply one expression, and if that is the case, sex does not become a big deal. It cannot be used for control or manipulation. What is interesting is that we have had encounters with females in your society (through this channel) who have found us threatening because of the sensual energy perhaps that they are perceiving in us. We are therefore threatening to them because perhaps we may gain more attention in a direction they don’t want to look at within themselves.

Not only that, but I haven’t met a man who hasn’t sat here and said, “Hmm, going to bed with Sasha…” I mean, any man that I’ve been around, that I’ve ever spoken to about being around your energy, all of a sudden this is the ideal sensual package that they all think they’ve been searching for.

And we tone it down quite a bit!! [Laughter] Generally, if people judge their own or others’ sexuality, they may be very threatened by our type of energy.

On our planet and in third density, there is so much emphasis on body types. I will be attracted to a certain body type; someone else will be attracted to this body type. Right now, we are all supposed to be skinny body types and physically in shape, and we’re not supposed to have extra weight on us, etc. etc. In fourth density or in Pleiadian reality, is there any attention at all on physical body type?

No, there is no attention on body type. Now, we may have preferences, but the preferences are so unimportant.

Well, if you’re all gorgeous, then why make a differentiation!

But do you know why we are all gorgeous?

Yes, I know. You all feel wonderful about yourselves, you feel beautiful, you feel healthy, you feel vibrant.

That is very accurate. If you all felt that way, you would all be “gorgeous” also. But one of the reasons why you perceive that you are not all gorgeous is that being in third density you still must create ways to separate each other from each other. So you come up with wonderful excuses for separation such as, “I can’t be with that person there because they’re too skinny, they’re too ugly, they’re too tall.”

Oh, conditions.

Exactly. Conditional love. Separation. Those symbols have been necessary for you to maintain the third-density identity. When you move into fourth density, those symbols will change because you will change.

So you as Pleiadians can enjoy the differences in each others’ bodies?

Oh yes. Most definitely. Now granted there are not a lot of differences in our bodies, but we can certainly appreciate those differences when they are there. Most definitely. But those differences are not from the result of trying to keep ourselves separate. They are natural diversifying characteristics.

If you are so together and whole, why is it there is a need to have another individual as a mate? If you are whole and not separate, you would have all that male and female inside your body. So what is the need for a mate?

There is no need per se, in the sense that we do not need to seek this idea. We may choose to have the idea literally for reasons of enjoyment and fun. Do you see what we mean? Enjoyment. When we express ourselves sexually with another entity, it is not that they fulfill a need for us. It is that together we play and we rejoice our own individual connections with the Creator. But it is not a need in any way.

It always seems in our society that people have relationships out of needs.

Yes, that is a third-density idea.

So basically there is a separation on many levels of ourselves and so we need to keep looking for relationships to fill the void.

Exactly. And that is the cycle. If individuals keep looking for someone else to fulfill their needs, no one else will ever fulfill their needs, so they will have a series of unsatisfying relationships. When you learn that you are the only one who can satisfy yourself, that you are the only one who can fulfill yourself, all of your relationships become joyous and ecstatic. When you do not need something from another individual, you can enjoy them for who they truly are.

It’s almost like a paradox here. How can you really tell that it’s not out of a need for joy? How can you tell if it’s just for joy?

It’s a good question, and in no way would we ever say to you that if you discover a relationship is out of need that you should disregard it and throw it away. In fact, we would say, don’t swing that opposite way if you discover that. So discovering it in this particular case is not necessarily a way that is going to change it. Living the relationship, recognizing your motivation and living it and healing through living it rather than rejecting it is going to be much more helpful. It’s quite all right to be in a relationship out of need. Recognize the need. Work with it, but do not reject it because of the need because you’ll keep creating relationships of need that you need to reject. Do you follow what we mean?

I’m thinking of multiple relationships at one time, having this individual and this individual and this individual and finding you’re able to love all these individuals. Isn’t that being loving out of certain needs and out of the separations inside the person?

Does not have to be. Can be. If the person is looking for things that they want inside of themselves in someone else and so they have all these different relationships trying to get those things into themselves, then it is out of need, yes. But if the person possesses all those things inside of them and is operating from total joy and ecstasy, they can have a relationship with none or one or many people based on joy, fun and excitement instead of need. Do you follow? There is a fine line. There is a difference.

Sasha, why do you think it is so hard for us to visualize the relationships that you are talking about, the ones that we’re heading toward?

Because the visualization of these relationships¾if you take it past just the intellect, triggers a tremendous amount of fear, and so the fear will reach out for protection and will often put a wall down, so you cannot imagine it so you cannot be threatened.

Just visualizing a relationship that wouldn’t fulfill my needs would scare me. Because that’s what I’m in it for!

Yes. exactly.

Could you offer us an interpretation of these needs as pointing to our eventual evolution into fourth density?

Yes. Fourth density is integration. Third density is separation. To use an analogy, separation is all the ingredients to make a soup sitting separately on the counter. Integration is the entire soup itself. Now, if you’re going from third to fourth and seeking to become whole, you must first recognize what the recipe requires. The recipe requires carrots and celery. The recipe needs those things, so for you to recognize those needs will allow you to chop them up and throw them into the pot which will then become the true expression of who you are in an integrated way. If you do not want to look at your needs, you will not know the recipe, you will not know how to cook the soup, and it will take a lot more energy, pain and struggle to eventually try to make up the recipe in a dark room. You see? The needs are important for the eventual outcome of integration. So your needs in and of themselves again are neutral ideas. They have no value except what you ascribe to them. You cannot judge those carrots on the counter as being wrong. How can you judge the carrots being wrong? It is your needs that are those carrots. They are ideas that will eventually be put into the pot, which will eventually become a very valuable thing. Nothing exists without a purpose, and your needs, as dysfunctional as they may be, are still eventually part of that soup and therefore very valid and very important that you read those lines in the recipe and chop up those vegetables and make them a part of the creation you are attempting to bring forth.

And the trick is to not expect to get the carrots from your mate.

Exactly. You have to be the one to go out and get the carrots.

Go to your own garden. In the way that relationships are set up now where it’s based on needs, if my mate does not provide the needs that I expected my mate to provide, I become angry, and obviously I think I’m angry at him but I’m angry because I’m not getting my needs met through my own efforts. Then in fourth-density relationships do you not have anger, or you don’t have that particular expression of anger?

We don’t have the expression of anger in the sense that we attach it to another person. We do not have that particular expression. There are times when we recognize, however, that perhaps we have not been true to ourselves. Now again, we’re talking in ways that are different than you, where we will recognize that we have embraced a reality that we don’t prefer, and the anger that is felt from that is not externalized.

You’re not attacking someone.


Sasha, in the book “Messages from Michael” in the first few pages Michael was discussing the fact that one of his purposes for channeling information was to get us off of this attention on relationships and help redirect our attention on self-improvement (that’s a paraphrase). It seems to me that part and parcel of third-density relationships has been that the relationship would take precedent over all else and that one of the things that we’re going through is the realization that personal growth must take precedence. As long as the relationship takes precedence, personal growth will always have to suffer. Do you want to comment on that?

Well, the way we will comment on it is that in one way there is no must in the sense that you are very welcome to choose relationships over personal growth, but don’t expect the fourth-density package deal with that choice. If you want to choose a relationship to be more important than your personal growth, then recognize it’s a choice of separation and that with that choice comes the package of third density. If you choose personal growth over relationships, you are choosing to integrate yourself, you are making a fourth-density choice and then you can accept the fourth-density package to go along with it. So neither one is wrong nor right. We are simply saying in terms of your choice, recognize what you get with that choice.

But if you choose personal growth, then you can use your relationship to enhance that?

If you choose personal growth, everything in your life (including your relationships) will enhance that.

Recently my relationship changed with my mate and I went on vacation. The last thing on my mind was a new relationship. But it came into my life suddenly.

You have given yourself an opportunity now to make a conscious choice. Do you want to pursue this relationship from a third-density perspective, getting the package deal there, or do you want to pursue it from the fourth-density relationship and getting the package deal with that? So yes a whole new world has opened up for you which can do nothing but enrich you in the long run.

I have one question. Back in this needs issue, I’m pursuing or engaged in a relationship by intention at the fourth density, and I find that there’s a tendency to go back and forth. The intention is to maintain the fourth density, and if I don’t stay conscious of that intention really clearly, then there’s a tendency to think I need to fall into third density and fulfill needs for the other person. And even if I’m able to say, “No, I refuse to do that,” then I start sometimes feeling guilty that if I’m involving the other person totally at a fourth-density level, then there’s no room for them to get their needs met by somebody else if that’s their choice.

Ahhh, but there is. We are sorry, but would you narrow the question and ask it again.

Well, I guess, the bottomline question with that as a set up is I don’t understand why I even feel concerned that I’m depriving them of getting their physical or physiological needs met by another person, if that’s the case, from my third-density perspective. You cannot deprive another person. If they feel deprived, it’s their choice. I appreciate that, but why does it seem to be my choice to feel like I’m doing that? That’s my question.

Because you are making the transition from third to fourth, and you’re recognizing the specific areas that you would like to clear. There is a part of you which still needs to feel validated by providing for another. And like we say with the soup, that need is okay. It needs to be seen and put in the pot in order to transform into the soup. So your seeing that in yourself is very important.

I follow, and I feel it’s a very good answer, and I can tune into it. But that still doesn’t mean that I would then meet those needs? Just recognizing them rather than meeting them.

We’re not understanding the exact question.

Well, I think you are because you answered it perfectly! You said that when I recognized the need that I would then put them in the pot. But does that mean that I would then be physically satisfying those needs, or just recognizing that her needs exist?

Her needs?


That doesn’t matter. You are not responsible for whether her needs are met or not. All you are responsible for is what in your integrity you would like to give to a relationship. That is all you are responsible for.

What Sasha is not saying is that you cannot satisfy those needs of another person. But you can play out that game, pulling yourself back into third density, which is exactly what I do not want to do. But sometimes I seem to feel that I could just get out of the way and she could get her needs satisfied whatever way she wanted but that’s depriving the potential of the fourth-density relationship.

Literally 75% of anger in relationships stems from one partner or the other believing or being angry that the other person is not fulfilling needs. Seventy-five percent. Now, imagine what a relationship would be like if you did not need to be fulfilled by another. For one thing, the level of anger would be very, very low¾hidden anger, hostility, nearly nonexistent. You cannot know what the other person’s needs are. They will not verbalize them; sometimes they don’t even know themselves on the conscious level. If you try to get caught in the game of satisfying those needs, you will get caught because it is a game, and because the person is seeking to have needs met outside of themselves, they will never be satisfied, and then they will be angry.

So all I can do is present myself at my fourth-density awareness, and let it be whatever it ends up being. And just be pure in my own intention.


One of the things that we ran into was that I finally started examining what I felt my needs were, and my two basic needs were safety and protection. My husband tried to provide that safety and protection for me, but he would have no idea how I want that provided. In other words, my idea of safety was for him to put his arm around me every time we walked into a room, but he didn’t know that that was what I wanted.

Exactly. You can never second-guess another person, whether you’re trying to protect them from their emotions or you’re trying to communicate to them, you cannot know, so the only thing that you can do is be 100% who you are. Period.

So this now leaves us with one more need: the need for somebody to be with us that maintains the fourth-density intention also. Obviously that is a trap.

If you have that need, you’re not in fourth density. You are still playing the third-density game.

Is one of the reasons that new relationships are so delightful is because we haven’t started manipulating the other person?

Yes, there has not been time yet for the new person to fulfill or not fulfill your needs. That’s why that sense of ecstasy is there. However, as soon as they either start fulfilling you or not fulfilling you, the anger, whether covert or overt, starts setting in, and that’s when the manipulation and the control begins.

That is so correct, because I was just thinking about the new relationship I was in, and it started out, I remember saying, “I don’t expect anything from it,” and then I realized about two months into it that I couldn’t say that anymore, I expected a few things! If the excitement and the romance does not peter out by its own nature then it’s simply sabotaged to death. Am I on track?

Yes. Now the Pleiadian relationships framework can be likened to the beginning of your relationships when your expectations were very low and you are truly in the level of enjoyment, ecstasy, play, caring and sharing. That taken 100-fold deeper is what our relationships are like all the time. So when you have no expectations about the other person fulfilling your needs, what a load off your mind that is, what a load off your energy. You can enjoy yourself, you can truly experience unconditional love. The conditional love that is felt in third density is the love you will give if your needs are met, and if your needs are not met you don’t give that love.

Can you begin to experience that love while still having the needs and recognizing them also?

Absolutely, yes.

So we don’t have to wait for our needs to be gone for us to experience this love?

Correct. Again, it’s not a light switch going on and off. It’s a gradual movement from third- to fourth-density thinking.

I know a lot of people right now would chuck the whole fourth-density idea if they thought they had to manually clear all their needs before they got there. By recognizing when you are conditionally loving someone, you then know there’s an issue, so then you can actually go through it by turning that around to unconditionally loving them in spite of the issue. It will just automatically start unfolding.

Yes. What wonderful things await all of you! We know that your relationships are painful, and we’ve heard comments that humans have made such as, “If you can’t feel the pain, you can’t feel the ecstasy.” In third density, that makes a lot of sense. In fourth density, that idea cannot exist. You all have a tremendous amount of love and joy locked within you that will begin to blossom when you stop expecting another person to validate you, when you stop expecting another person to make you feel whole. Once that idea is relinquished, you will soar. That love that you will contain will be beyond what you can now conceive. You are moving in that direction, and those of you who choose to embrace the fourth-density idea, whether diving right in or taking it baby steps, going to start seeing changes, and you’re going to start feeling changes inside of yourself. The pain will start to subside. The joy will start to grow, and we truly are excited to watch this happen because you will start to begin to see your divine connection. You will start to begin to know truly the beams of love that you really are. We would like to honor you and acknowledge you for taking a path that, yes, is difficult. But we would also like to remind you that if you were incapable of taking the path you never would have chosen it. And so, we would like to close this evening with that acknowledgement and recognition of all that you’ve chosen, for like the analogy of the soup and the carrot, the things that you see now that you don’t like in yourself, that you judge, that you’re angry at, are so valuable because they make up the soup. If you judge them, they will stay there on the counter, and they will always be an issue. But if you allow them to exist and you take them with you in your growth, they will transform.

Much, much, much love to each and every one of you. It has been an absolute joy to have been a part of your gathering this evening, and it is our sensing that we will speak again on this matter shortly. Much love and goodnight.

Authors Details: Lyssa Royal Germane Channeled

Lyssa Royal is an internationally known channel and author. Germane considers himself to be a non physical group consciousness associated with the Orion Light – a future integrated version of the galactic family of which we on Earth are a part. He chose the name “Germane” because of it’s english definition: “Coming from the same source, or significantly relevant to.” There is no connection to St. Germain.
The Authors Web Site


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *